PrepPilot is not an academic content provider. Your school keeps its curriculum, classrooms and teachers. RADAR turns learner responses into evidence, helps teams decide what deserves attention, and looks again after action.
Content is the input. Independent evaluation is the product.
RADAREvidence loop
01Run
02Analyse
03Decide
04Act
05Recheck
Content providers help define what learners study.
The PrepPilot difference
Understand what learners have demonstrated—and what deserves attention next.
Better academic outcomes begin with better-informed action. RADAR gives a school a repeatable language for evaluation without asking it to replace its academic programme.
RADAR · A continuous evaluation framework
Five deliberate moves. One repeating evidence loop.
01 / Run
Run a focused check.
Use the curriculum and question scope the school has chosen. Learners respond through objective, numeric and typed written work.
Curriculum-bound
Mixed response types
02 / Analyse
See the response, not only the score.
Objective and numeric work is scored deterministically. Typed written work is evaluated against explicit rubrics, with confidence and evidence retained.
Deterministic scoring
Rubric-grounded feedback
03 / Decide
Turn evidence into a priority.
Authorized staff can review learner and batch evidence without collapsing every result into a single rank or label.
Learner evidence
Authorized batch view
04 / Act
Let teachers choose the response.
Reteach, regroup, practise, discuss or observe further—the academic action remains a professional school decision.
Teacher-owned
Role-bounded
05 / Recheck
Look again with fresh evidence.
A new focused check shows what changed, what remains uncertain and where another teaching decision may be useful.
Retained history
Evidence-qualified trends
How the evaluation works
AI where it helps. Boundaries where they matter.
AI does not do the learner's thinking or make the school's academic decision. It helps make typed written thinking visible against a rubric. Objective and numeric work stays deterministic, uncertainty is explicit, and teachers remain in charge.
01Objective and numeric
Deterministic scoringKnown-answer work is scored by explicit rules, not model opinion.
02Typed descriptive
AI-assisted evaluationWritten thinking is checked against a defined rubric with structured evidence.
03Uncertain or exceptional
Confidence and review gatesLow-confidence cases are made visible for human review instead of being silently overstated.
04Academic response
Teacher judgementThe school decides what to reteach, practise, discuss or investigate next.
AI supports the evidence. Teachers own the learning decision.
Clear operating boundaries
A differentiator your school can explain.
Curriculum
Yours.
The school selects the programme, scope and material being evaluated.
Evidence
Scoped.
Authorized staff see the right learner, batch and subject context. Family-only practice remains separate.
Decisions
Human.
Evaluation informs the conversation; it does not replace teacher judgement or become an official grade.
A bounded starting point
Start with a question the school wants answered.
Define the curriculum scope, people, measures and privacy boundary before the first cycle. Then use repeated evidence to decide whether RADAR is useful for the school.
Staff roles, data scope and family access agreed in advance
Start the conversation
Plan a focused RADAR pilot.
Tell us enough to understand the school context. No learner data is needed for the first conversation, and submitting this form does not create a workspace or agree commercial terms.